Celeron N5095 vs N5105
Description
Both models N5095 and N5105 are based on Tremont architecture.
Tremont is a low-power architecture. It is found on Atoms, Celerons and Pentiums Silver CPUs. Uses the 10nm proccess and the CPUs have up to 24 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.5 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Tremont is a low-power architecture. It is found on Atoms, Celerons and Pentiums Silver CPUs. Uses the 10nm proccess and the CPUs have up to 24 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.5 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
906c0
Core
Jasper Lake
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2021
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
64.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
9.83k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
9.74k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
3.65k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
3.88k (x1.64)
TOTAL
26.6k
27.1k (x1.02)
Multithread
N5095
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
25.04k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
24.7k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
9.29k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
5.06k (x1.86)
TOTAL
93.26k
64.09k (x0.69)
Performance/W
N5095
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2567 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1012 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
181 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
6217 points/W
6409 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5095
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
3475 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3486 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
814 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
9174 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4