Celeron N5095 vs 4205U
Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the 4205U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the 4205U gets 37.6 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 2.5 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the 4205U gets 37.6 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 2.5 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
806ec
Core
Jasper Lake
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2048 kB
Date
April 2021
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
20.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
37.61k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
6.53k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
9.46k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
2.28k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
2.34k (x0.99)
TOTAL
26.6k
20.61k (x0.77)
Multithread
N5095
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
12.97k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
18.12k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
4.33k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
2.18k (x0.8)
TOTAL
93.26k
37.61k (x0.4)
Performance/W
N5095
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W
865 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2567 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1012 points/W
289 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
181 points/W
146 points/W
TOTAL
6217 points/W
2507 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5095
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
3475 points/GHz
3629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3486 points/GHz
5255 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
1269 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
814 points/GHz
1298 points/GHz
TOTAL
9174 points/GHz
11451 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4