Celeron N4120 vs Virtual CPU 2,84GHz
Description
The N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the 2,84GHz is based on -.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 46.2 k points while the 2,84GHz gets 79.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 1.7 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 46.2 k points while the 2,84GHz gets 79.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 1.7 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
f4a
Core
Gemini Lake
-
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.84 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.84 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
-
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
6 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
- kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
- kB
Cache L3
0 kB
- kB
Date
November 2019
-
Mean monothread perf.
18.9k points
21.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.17k points
79.76k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4120
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
5.94k
4.27k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
7.51k
8.93k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
2.79k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
5.23k (x1.96)
TOTAL
18.9k
21.22k (x1.12)
Multithread
N4120
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
19.35k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
19.77k
40.57k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.71k
13.15k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.67k
6.7k (x1.83)
TOTAL
46.17k
79.76k (x1.73)
Performance/W
N4120
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
2503 points/W