Celeron N4120 vs Pentium G3260
Description
The N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the G3260 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 46.2 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 1.3 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 46.2 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 1.3 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
306c3
Core
Gemini Lake
Haswell
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
53 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2019
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
18.9k points
30.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.17k points
58.89k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4120
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
5.94k
11.73k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
7.51k
10.45k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
4.55k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
3.83k (x1.43)
TOTAL
18.9k
30.56k (x1.62)
Multithread
N4120
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
22.99k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
19.77k
20.53k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.71k
8.82k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.67k
6.55k (x1.79)
TOTAL
46.17k
58.89k (x1.28)
Performance/W
N4120
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
2503 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3294 points/W
387 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
611 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
7694 points/W
1111 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4120
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
2286 points/GHz
3555 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2887 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1069 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1029 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
TOTAL
7271 points/GHz
9261 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4