Celeron N4120 vs Core i5-8265U
Description
The N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 46.2 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 3.2 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 46.2 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 3.2 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
806ec
Core
Gemini Lake
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2019
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
18.9k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.17k points
143.23k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4120
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.94k
13.6k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
7.51k
20.03k (x2.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
5.19k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
7.05k (x2.64)
TOTAL
18.9k
45.87k (x2.43)
Multithread
N4120
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
51.42k (x3.42)
Test#2 (FP)
19.77k
77.48k (x3.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.71k
16.65k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.67k
3.69k (x1.01)
TOTAL
46.17k
149.24k (x3.23)
Performance/W
N4120
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
2503 points/W
3428 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3294 points/W
5165 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/W
1110 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
611 points/W
246 points/W
TOTAL
7694 points/W
9949 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4120
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
2286 points/GHz
3487 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2887 points/GHz
5135 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1069 points/GHz
1332 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1029 points/GHz
1808 points/GHz
TOTAL
7271 points/GHz
11762 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4