Celeron N4120 vs N5105
Description
The N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 46.2 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.4 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 46.2 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.4 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
906c0
Core
Gemini Lake
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
6 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
18.9k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.17k points
64.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4120
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
5.94k
9.83k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
7.51k
9.74k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
3.65k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
3.88k (x1.45)
TOTAL
18.9k
27.1k (x1.43)
Multithread
N4120
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
25.04k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
19.77k
24.7k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.71k
9.29k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.67k
5.06k (x1.38)
TOTAL
46.17k
64.09k (x1.39)
Performance/W
N4120
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
2503 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3294 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
611 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
7694 points/W
6409 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4120
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
2286 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2887 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1069 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1029 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
7271 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4