Celeron N4120 vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Description
The N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 46.2 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.7 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4120 gets a score of 46.2 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.7 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
100fa0
Core
Gemini Lake
Thuban
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/6
TDP
6 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2019
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
18.9k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.17k points
80.19k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4120
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.94k
5.17k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
7.51k
5.33k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
2.76k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
3.51k (x1.31)
TOTAL
18.9k
16.77k (x0.89)
Multithread
N4120
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.02k
29.82k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
19.77k
30.79k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.71k
15.88k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.67k
3.69k (x1.01)
TOTAL
46.17k
80.19k (x1.74)
Performance/W
N4120
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2503 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3294 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
611 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
7694 points/W
844 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4120
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2286 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2887 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1069 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1029 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
7271 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4