Celeron N4100 vs Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Description
The N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the N4100 is 1.1 times faster than the 7c Gen 2. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the N4100 is 1.1 times faster than the 7c Gen 2. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
f4a
Core
Gemini Lake
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.55 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.55 GHz
Socket
BGA1090
-
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
6 W
7 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
- kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
- kB
Cache L3
kB
- kB
Date
December 2017
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
17.21k points
16.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.57k points
37k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4100
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
4.72k
3.87k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
6.99k
8.17k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.69k
2.67k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.81k
1.82k (x0.65)
TOTAL
17.21k
16.53k (x0.96)
Multithread
N4100
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
12.54k
3.46k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
17.99k
22.59k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
8.09k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
2.85k (x0.86)
TOTAL
40.57k
37k (x0.91)
Performance/W
N4100
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
2090 points/W
495 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2999 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/W
1156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
555 points/W
407 points/W
TOTAL
6762 points/W
5286 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4100
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
1966 points/GHz
1516 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2914 points/GHz
3205 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1122 points/GHz
1047 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1171 points/GHz
712 points/GHz
TOTAL
7172 points/GHz
6481 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4