Celeron N4100 vs Xeon E5-2651 v2
Description
The N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E5-2651 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the E5-2651 v2 gets 415 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2651 v2 is 10.2 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the E5-2651 v2 gets 415 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2651 v2 is 10.2 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
306e4
Core
Gemini Lake
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1090
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/4
12/24
TDP
6 W
W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
30720 kB
Date
December 2017
October 2013
Mean monothread perf.
17.21k points
17.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.57k points
426.18k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4100
E5-2651 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
4.72k
6.75k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
6.99k
6.05k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.69k
2.61k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.81k
2.26k (x0.81)
TOTAL
17.21k
17.68k (x1.03)
Multithread
N4100
E5-2651 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
12.54k
168.18k (x13.41)
Test#2 (FP)
17.99k
159.6k (x8.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
77.04k (x11.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
10.19k (x3.06)
TOTAL
40.57k
415.01k (x10.23)
Performance/W
N4100
E5-2651 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2090 points/W