Celeron N4020 vs Virtual CPU 2,84GHz
Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the 2,84GHz is based on -.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the 2,84GHz gets 79.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 3.2 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the 2,84GHz gets 79.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 3.2 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
f4a
Core
Gemini Lake
-
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.84 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.84 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
-
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/8
TDP
6 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
- kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
- kB
Cache L3
0 kB
- kB
Date
November 2019
-
Mean monothread perf.
17.67k points
21.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.26k points
79.76k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
5.14k
4.27k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
7.89k
8.93k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.87k
2.79k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.76k
5.23k (x2.97)
TOTAL
17.67k
21.22k (x1.2)
Multithread
N4020
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
7.46k
19.35k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
11.61k
40.57k (x3.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
13.15k (x3.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.91k
6.7k (x3.5)
TOTAL
25.26k
79.76k (x3.16)
Performance/W
N4020
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
1244 points/W