| | | | | | |

Celeron N4020 vs Xeon E5645


Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E5645 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the E5645 gets 77 k points.

Summarizing, the E5645 is 3 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a8
206c2
Core
Gemini Lake
Westmere-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
6 /6
TDP
6 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
12288 kB
Date
November 2019
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
17.67k points
15.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.26k points
76.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N4020
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
1.25k
1.78k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
5.19k
3.91k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.56k
2.52k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.61k
2.42k (x1.51)
TOTAL
10.61k
10.64k (x1)

Multithread

N4020

E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
9.67k (x5.74)
Test#2 (FP)
7.29k
22.92k (x3.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.51k
14.31k (x4.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
3.81k (x2.95)
TOTAL
13.78k
50.7k (x3.68)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
5.14k
6.47k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
7.89k
4.4k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.87k
2.43k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.76k
2.33k (x1.32)
TOTAL
17.67k
15.64k (x0.89)

Multithread

N4020

E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
7.46k
34.43k (x4.61)
Test#2 (FP)
11.61k
24.23k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
14.48k (x3.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.91k
3.81k (x1.99)
TOTAL
25.26k
76.96k (x3.05)

Performance/W
N4020
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
1244 points/W
430 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1936 points/W
303 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
712 points/W
181 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
319 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
4211 points/W
962 points/W

Performance/GHz
N4020
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
1837 points/GHz
2311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2816 points/GHz
1573 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1026 points/GHz
867 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
630 points/GHz
833 points/GHz
TOTAL
6309 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4