Celeron N4020 vs Core 2 Duo P8600
Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the P8600 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the P8600 gets 21 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 1.2 times faster than the P8600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the P8600 gets 21 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 1.2 times faster than the P8600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
10676
Core
Gemini Lake
Penryn-3M
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA 479
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
6 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2019
July 2008
Mean monothread perf.
17.67k points
12.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.26k points
20.99k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
5.14k
2.76k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
7.89k
6.11k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.87k
2.3k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.76k
1.25k (x0.71)
TOTAL
17.67k
12.41k (x0.7)
Multithread
N4020
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
7.46k
4.94k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
11.61k
10.59k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
4.22k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.91k
1.24k (x0.65)
TOTAL
25.26k
20.99k (x0.83)
Performance/W
N4020
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
1244 points/W
198 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1936 points/W
424 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
712 points/W
169 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
319 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
4211 points/W
840 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4020
P8600
Test#1 (Integers)
1837 points/GHz
1151 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2816 points/GHz
2545 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1026 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
630 points/GHz
520 points/GHz
TOTAL
6309 points/GHz
5173 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4