Celeron N4020 vs Core 2 Duo E8400
Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E8400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the E8400 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E8400 is 1.1 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the E8400 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E8400 is 1.1 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
1067a
Core
Gemini Lake
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
17.67k points
17.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.26k points
27.11k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N4020
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1.25k
2.47k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
5.19k
6.74k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.56k
2.87k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.61k
4.47k (x2.78)
TOTAL
10.61k
16.55k (x1.56)
Multithread
N4020
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
4.64k (x2.76)
Test#2 (FP)
7.29k
12.36k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.51k
4.86k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
1.96k (x1.52)
TOTAL
13.78k
23.82k (x1.73)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
5.14k
3.3k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
7.89k
7.28k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.87k
2.88k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.76k
3.83k (x2.18)
TOTAL
17.67k
17.28k (x0.98)
Multithread
N4020
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
7.46k
6.3k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
11.61k
13.71k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
5.32k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.91k
1.78k (x0.93)
TOTAL
25.26k
27.11k (x1.07)
Performance/W
N4020
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1244 points/W
97 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1936 points/W
211 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
712 points/W
82 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
319 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
4211 points/W
417 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4020
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1837 points/GHz
1099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2816 points/GHz
2426 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1026 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
630 points/GHz
1278 points/GHz
TOTAL
6309 points/GHz
5762 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4