| | | | | | |

Celeron N4020 vs N3450


Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the N3450 is based on Goldmont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the N3450 gets 39.3 k points.

Summarizing, the N3450 is 1.6 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a8
506c9
Core
Gemini Lake
Apollo Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
6 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
November 2019
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
17.67k points
13.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.26k points
39.33k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N4020
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
1.25k
1.54k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
5.19k
2.86k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.56k
1.88k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.61k
1.78k (x1.11)
TOTAL
10.61k
8.06k (x0.76)

Multithread

N4020

N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
5.91k (x3.51)
Test#2 (FP)
7.29k
8.55k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.51k
5.48k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
2.98k (x2.31)
TOTAL
13.78k
22.92k (x1.66)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
5.14k
5.95k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
7.89k
3.45k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.87k
1.92k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.76k
1.78k (x1.01)
TOTAL
17.67k
13.11k (x0.74)

Multithread

N4020

N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
7.46k
21.38k (x2.86)
Test#2 (FP)
11.61k
9.84k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
5.25k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.91k
2.86k (x1.5)
TOTAL
25.26k
39.33k (x1.56)

Performance/W
N4020
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
1244 points/W
3564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1936 points/W
1640 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
712 points/W
875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
319 points/W
477 points/W
TOTAL
4211 points/W
6555 points/W

Performance/GHz
N4020
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
1837 points/GHz
2706 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2816 points/GHz
1570 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1026 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
630 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
6309 points/GHz
5959 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4