| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Pentium Dual-Core T4500


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the T4500 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the T4500 gets 23 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.7 times faster than the T4500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
1067a
Core
Gemini Lake
Penryn-3M
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket P
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
1024 kB
Date
December 2017
January 2010

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
2105 (25.11%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
5401 (2.10%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
2266 (-17.57%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
1220 (-64.58%)
TOTAL
13165
10991 (-16.51%)

Multithread

J4105

T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
4205 (-34.21%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
10753 (-46.29%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
4533 (-55.65%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
1343 (-72.82%)
TOTAL
41572
20833 (-49.89%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
2630 (-46.27%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
5884 (-18.90%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
2364 (-14.19%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
1187 (-64.21%)
TOTAL
18223
12065 (-33.79%)

Multithread

J4105

T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
5265 (-72.06%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
11691 (-57.40%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
4733 (-54.29%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
1345 (-72.28%)
TOTAL
61495
23034 (-62.54%)

Performance/W
J4105
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
150 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
334 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
135 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
658 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
2558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
516 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5246 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8