Celeron J4105 vs Pentium E5500
Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E5500 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 41.6 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 2 times faster than the E5500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 41.6 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 2 times faster than the E5500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
1067a
Core
Gemini Lake
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2048 kB
Date
December 2017
April 2010
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
12.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
20.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
2.56k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
5.29k
6.54k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.76k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.44k
0.91k (x0.26)
TOTAL
13.16k
12.77k (x0.97)
Multithread
J4105
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
6.39k
4.32k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
10.8k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.22k
4.7k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.94k
0.87k (x0.18)
TOTAL
41.57k
20.69k (x0.5)
Performance/W
J4105
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
639 points/W
66 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2002 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1022 points/W
72 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
494 points/W
13 points/W
TOTAL
4157 points/W
318 points/W
Performance/GHz
J4105
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
673 points/GHz
914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2116 points/GHz
2335 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1099 points/GHz
985 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1377 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
5266 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4