| | | | | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Pentium E5200 (R0)


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E5200 (R0) is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the E5200 (R0) gets 24.9 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.5 times faster than the E5200 (R0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
1067a
Core
Gemini Lake
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2048 kB
Date
December 2017
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
24.89k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
2.3k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
5.29k
5.9k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.47k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.44k
1.21k (x0.35)
TOTAL
13.16k
11.89k (x0.9)

Multithread

J4105

E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
6.39k
4.63k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
10.62k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.22k
4.95k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.94k
1.82k (x0.37)
TOTAL
41.57k
22.03k (x0.53)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
2.87k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
6.42k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.58k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
1.21k (x0.37)
TOTAL
18.22k
13.08k (x0.72)

Multithread

J4105

E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
5.74k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
12.78k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
5.18k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
1.2k (x0.25)
TOTAL
61.49k
24.89k (x0.4)

Performance/W
J4105
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
88 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
197 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
383 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
2568 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
485 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5232 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4