| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Xeon X5670


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the X5670 gets 103.2 k points.

Summarizing, the X5670 is 1.7 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
206c2
Core
Gemini Lake
Westmere-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
6 /6
TDP
10 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
12288 kB
Date
December 2017
March 2010

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
8389 (71.35%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
5603 (-22.78%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
3350 (21.63%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
3017 (-9.04%)
TOTAL
18223
20359 (11.72%)

Multithread

J4105

X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
44607 (136.74%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
30967 (12.83%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
19219 (85.63%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
8426 (73.62%)
TOTAL
61495
103219 (67.85%)

Performance/W
J4105
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
470 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
326 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
89 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
1087 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
2517 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
1681 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
905 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
6108 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8