Celeron J4105 vs Xeon X5670
Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 1.9 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 1.9 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
206c2
Core
Gemini Lake
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
6 /6
TDP
10 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
12288 kB
Date
December 2017
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
115.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
8.35k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
5.58k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
3.32k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
3k (x0.9)
TOTAL
18.22k
20.26k (x1.11)
Multithread
J4105
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
49.72k (x2.64)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
35.19k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
21.88k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
8.6k (x1.77)
TOTAL
61.49k
115.4k (x1.88)
Performance/W
J4105
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
1215 points/W
Performance/GHz
J4105
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4