| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Xeon W3550


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the W3550 is based on .

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the W3550 gets 73.2 k points.

Summarizing, the W3550 is 1.2 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
106a5
Core
Gemini Lake
Bloomfield
Architecture
Goldmont Plus
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
10 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
December 2017
August 2009

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
2300 (36.72%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
5213 (-1.45%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
3312 (20.48%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
3092 (-10.21%)
TOTAL
13165
13917 (5.71%)

Multithread

J4105

W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
8747 (36.85%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
19797 (-1.10%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
12376 (21.08%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
6173 (24.93%)
TOTAL
41572
47093 (13.28%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
8338 (70.32%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
5563 (-23.33%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
3260 (18.34%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
3082 (-7.10%)
TOTAL
18223
20242 (11.08%)

Multithread

J4105

W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
32503 (72.49%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
21589 (-21.34%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
12850 (24.12%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
6273 (29.27%)
TOTAL
61495
73215 (19.06%)

Performance/W
J4105
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
250 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
99 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
563 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
2502 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
978 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
6073 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8