| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Xeon L5430


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the L5430 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the L5430 gets 51.6 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.2 times faster than the L5430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
1067a
Core
Gemini Lake
Harpertown
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket 771
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
50 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x6144 kB
Date
December 2017
September 2008

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
3095 (-36.78%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
6862 (-5.42%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
2658 (-3.52%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
3009 (-9.29%)
TOTAL
18223
15624 (-14.26%)

Multithread

J4105

L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
12397 (-34.21%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
27266 (-0.65%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
10409 (0.54%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
1567 (-67.71%)
TOTAL
61495
51639 (-16.03%)

Performance/W
J4105
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
248 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
545 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
208 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
31 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
1033 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1160 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
2573 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
996 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5858 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8