| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Xeon E5506


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E5506 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5506 is 1.5 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
106a5
Core
Gemini Lake
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
10 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2017
March 2009

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
1206 (-28.33%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
2754 (-47.94%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
1941 (-29.40%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
781 (-77.33%)
TOTAL
13165
6681 (-49.25%)

Multithread

J4105

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
12246 (91.60%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
25545 (27.61%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
17097 (67.26%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
5008 (1.35%)
TOTAL
41572
59896 (44.08%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
4477 (-8.54%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
2994 (-58.74%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
1808 (-34.38%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
692 (-79.13%)
TOTAL
18223
9971 (-45.28%)

Multithread

J4105

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
41004 (117.62%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
28167 (2.63%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
17399 (68.06%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
3879 (-20.08%)
TOTAL
61495
90449 (47.08%)

Performance/W
J4105
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
352 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
1131 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
2099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
4675 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8