| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Xeon E5504


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E5504 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the E5504 gets 42 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.5 times faster than the E5504 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
106a5
Core
Gemini Lake
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
10 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2017
March 2009

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
4574 (-6.57%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
3069 (-57.70%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
1851 (-32.79%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
1426 (-57.03%)
TOTAL
18223
10920 (-40.08%)

Multithread

J4105

E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
19066 (1.19%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
12521 (-54.38%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
7972 (-23.00%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
2391 (-50.73%)
TOTAL
61495
41950 (-31.78%)

Performance/W
J4105
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
100 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
524 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
2287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
1535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
926 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
713 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5460 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8