| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Xeon E5502


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E5502 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.8 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
106a5
Core
Gemini Lake
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
1.867 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.867 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
10 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2017
March 2009

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
4758 (-2.81%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
3146 (-56.64%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
1939 (-29.61%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
1454 (-56.17%)
TOTAL
18223
11297 (-38.01%)

Multithread

J4105

E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
9478 (-49.70%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
6298 (-77.05%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
3861 (-62.71%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
2642 (-45.56%)
TOTAL
61495
22279 (-63.77%)

Performance/W
J4105
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
79 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
48 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
278 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
2549 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
1685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1038 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
779 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
6051 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8