| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Xeon E5472


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E5472 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the E5472 gets 48.6 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.3 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
10676
Core
Gemini Lake
Harpertown
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA-771
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x6144 kB
Date
December 2017
November 2007

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
2288 (35.96%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
5850 (10.58%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
2441 (-11.19%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
4810 (39.68%)
TOTAL
13165
15388 (16.89%)

Multithread

J4105

E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
9063 (41.80%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
23090 (15.35%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
9698 (-5.13%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
2529 (-48.83%)
TOTAL
41572
44379 (6.75%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
2883 (-41.11%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
6356 (-12.40%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
2549 (-7.47%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
4830 (45.59%)
TOTAL
18223
16617 (-8.81%)

Multithread

J4105

E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
11189 (-40.62%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
24850 (-9.46%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
10037 (-3.05%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
2541 (-47.63%)
TOTAL
61495
48617 (-20.94%)

Performance/W
J4105
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
140 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
311 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
125 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
608 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
2119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1610 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5539 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8