| | | | | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Xeon E5-4640


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the E5-4640 gets 581.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 9.5 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
206d7
Core
Gemini Lake
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/4
8 /16
TDP
10 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
20480 kB
Date
December 2017
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
13.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
610.16k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
1.66k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
5.29k
5.26k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.13k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.44k
2.53k (x0.73)
TOTAL
13.16k
11.58k (x0.88)

Multithread

J4105

E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
6.39k
77.64k (x12.15)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
212.2k (x10.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.22k
113.11k (x11.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.94k
7.54k (x1.53)
TOTAL
41.57k
410.48k (x9.87)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
6.19k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
5.89k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.11k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
2.51k (x0.76)
TOTAL
18.22k
16.7k (x0.92)

Multithread

J4105

E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
244.88k (x13)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
215.35k (x7.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
114.64k (x11.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
6.76k (x1.39)
TOTAL
61.49k
581.63k (x9.46)

Performance/W
J4105
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
2578 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
2267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
1207 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
6122 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
2210 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
2105 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
755 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
895 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5966 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4