Celeron J4105 vs Pentium G4560
Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the G4560 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.
Summarizing, the G4560 is 1.5 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.
Summarizing, the G4560 is 1.5 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
906e9
Core
Gemini Lake
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
10 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
44.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
89.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
13.01k (x2.66)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
18.74k (x2.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
5.06k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
7.4k (x2.23)
TOTAL
18.22k
44.21k (x2.43)
Multithread
J4105
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
27.22k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
43.79k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
11.74k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
7.16k (x1.47)
TOTAL
61.49k
89.91k (x1.46)
Performance/W
J4105
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
811 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
1665 points/W
Performance/GHz
J4105
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
2114 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
12632 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4