| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Pentium 4415U


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the 4415U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the 4415U gets 56.4 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.1 times faster than the 4415U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
806e9
Core
Gemini Lake
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
2048 kB
Date
December 2017
January 2017

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
2339 (39.04%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
9513 (79.83%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
3050 (10.96%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
2585 (-24.92%)
TOTAL
13165
17488 (32.84%)

Multithread

J4105

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
4711 (-26.30%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
21734 (8.57%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
7346 (-28.14%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
2435 (-50.73%)
TOTAL
41572
36224 (-12.86%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
8290 (69.34%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
11823 (62.95%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
3092 (12.24%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
4185 (26.14%)
TOTAL
18223
27389 (50.30%)

Multithread

J4105

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
17238 (-8.52%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
27398 (-0.17%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
7442 (-28.12%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
4312 (-11.14%)
TOTAL
61495
56389 (-8.30%)

Performance/W
J4105
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
1827 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
496 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
3759 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
3605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
5140 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
11908 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8