| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core 2 Quad Q9550


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the Q9550 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the Q9550 gets 49 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.3 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
1067a
Core
Gemini Lake
Yorkfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.833 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.833 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
128+128 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
December 2017
March 2008

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
2597 (54.35%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
6674 (26.17%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
2718 (-1.11%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
4433 (28.73%)
TOTAL
13165
16422 (24.75%)

Multithread

J4105

Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
9915 (55.14%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
25367 (26.72%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
10314 (0.90%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
3365 (-31.89%)
TOTAL
41572
48962 (17.78%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
3282 (-32.96%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
7276 (0.28%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
2835 (2.91%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
3896 (17.43%)
TOTAL
18223
17289 (-5.13%)

Multithread

J4105

Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
11721 (-37.79%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
24914 (-9.22%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
9773 (-5.61%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
2572 (-47.00%)
TOTAL
61495
48980 (-20.35%)

Performance/W
J4105
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
123 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
262 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
103 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
516 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
2568 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1375 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
6103 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8