| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core 2 Quad Q8400


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the Q8400 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the Q8400 gets 51.9 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.2 times faster than the Q8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
1067a
Core
Gemini Lake
Yorkfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.666 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.666 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
128+128 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2017
April 2009

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
2441 (45.08%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
6239 (17.94%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
2620 (-4.69%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
1427 (-58.55%)
TOTAL
13165
12727 (-3.32%)

Multithread

J4105

Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
9712 (51.95%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
24808 (23.93%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
10507 (2.79%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
2028 (-58.96%)
TOTAL
41572
47054 (13.19%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
3085 (-36.99%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
6800 (-6.28%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
2733 (-0.78%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
1417 (-57.28%)
TOTAL
18223
14035 (-22.98%)

Multithread

J4105

Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
12248 (-35.00%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
26838 (-2.21%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
10818 (4.49%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
2017 (-58.45%)
TOTAL
61495
51921 (-15.57%)

Performance/W
J4105
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
129 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
283 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
114 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
21 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
547 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1025 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
532 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5265 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8