| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core 2 Duo T6600


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the T6600 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the T6600 gets 20.6 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 3 times faster than the T6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
1067a
Core
Gemini Lake
Penryn-3M
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket P
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2048 kB
Date
December 2017
January 2009

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
2009 (19.43%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
5168 (-2.31%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
2172 (-20.98%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
753 (-78.14%)
TOTAL
13165
10102 (-23.26%)

Multithread

J4105

T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
3880 (-39.29%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
9837 (-50.86%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
4167 (-59.23%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
692 (-85.99%)
TOTAL
41572
18576 (-55.32%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
2551 (-47.88%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
5587 (-23.00%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
2262 (-17.90%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
751 (-77.36%)
TOTAL
18223
11151 (-38.81%)

Multithread

J4105

T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
4900 (-74.00%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
10706 (-60.99%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
4335 (-58.13%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
688 (-85.82%)
TOTAL
61495
20628 (-66.46%)

Performance/W
J4105
T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
140 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
306 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
124 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
20 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
589 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1160 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
2539 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
341 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5068 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8