| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core 2 Duo P8400


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the P8400 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the P8400 gets 21 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.9 times faster than the P8400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
10676
Core
Gemini Lake
Peryn-3M
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.267 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.267 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket P
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
July 2008

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
1779 (5.76%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
4949 (-6.45%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
2078 (-24.41%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
1438 (-58.25%)
TOTAL
13165
10244 (-22.19%)

Multithread

J4105

P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
3527 (-44.81%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
9750 (-51.29%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
4071 (-60.18%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
1439 (-70.88%)
TOTAL
41572
18787 (-54.81%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
2428 (-50.40%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
5402 (-25.54%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
2128 (-22.76%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
1426 (-57.02%)
TOTAL
18223
11384 (-37.53%)

Multithread

J4105

P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
4813 (-74.45%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
10581 (-61.45%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
4176 (-59.67%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
1449 (-70.15%)
TOTAL
61495
21019 (-65.82%)

Performance/W
J4105
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
193 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
423 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
841 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
2383 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
938 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
629 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5022 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8