| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core 2 Duo E8500


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E8500 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the E8500 gets 31.2 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 2 times faster than the E8500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
1067a
Core
Gemini Lake
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
3.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.167 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
December 2017
August 2008

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
3645 (-25.55%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
8072 (11.26%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
3147 (14.27%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
4594 (38.47%)
TOTAL
18223
19458 (6.78%)

Multithread

J4105

E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
7105 (-62.29%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
15787 (-42.48%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
6196 (-40.15%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
2125 (-56.21%)
TOTAL
61495
31214 (-49.24%)

Performance/W
J4105
E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
109 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
95 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
480 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1151 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
2549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1450 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
6144 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8