Celeron J4105 vs Core 2 Duo E8400
Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E8400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the E8400 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.3 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the E8400 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.3 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
1067a
Core
Gemini Lake
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
December 2017
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
17.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
27.11k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
2.47k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
5.29k
6.74k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.87k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.44k
4.47k (x1.3)
TOTAL
13.16k
16.55k (x1.26)
Multithread
J4105
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
6.39k
4.64k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
12.36k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.22k
4.86k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.94k
1.96k (x0.4)
TOTAL
41.57k
23.82k (x0.57)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
3.3k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
7.28k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.88k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
3.83k (x1.16)
TOTAL
18.22k
17.28k (x0.95)
Multithread
J4105
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
6.3k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
13.71k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
5.32k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
1.78k (x0.37)
TOTAL
61.49k
27.11k (x0.44)
Performance/W
J4105
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
97 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
211 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
82 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
417 points/W
Performance/GHz
J4105
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
2426 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1278 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5762 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4