| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core 2 Duo E8400


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E8400 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the E8400 gets 26.9 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.3 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
1067a
Core
Gemini Lake
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
December 2017
January 2008

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
2440 (45.04%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
6683 (26.34%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
2848 (3.61%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
4295 (24.72%)
TOTAL
13165
16266 (23.56%)

Multithread

J4105

E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
4546 (-28.88%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
12116 (-39.48%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
4685 (-54.17%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
1905 (-61.45%)
TOTAL
41572
23251 (-44.07%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
3263 (-33.36%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
7184 (-0.98%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
2841 (3.15%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
3622 (9.17%)
TOTAL
18223
16910 (-7.21%)

Multithread

J4105

E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
6302 (-66.56%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
13636 (-50.32%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
5225 (-49.53%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
1720 (-64.56%)
TOTAL
61495
26882 (-56.28%)

Performance/W
J4105
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
97 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
210 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
26 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
414 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1088 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
2395 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
947 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1207 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5637 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8