| | | | | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core i7-640LM


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i7-640LM is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the i7-640LM gets 31.7 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.9 times faster than the i7-640LM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
20655
Core
Gemini Lake
Calpella
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1288
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
10 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2017
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
16.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
31.74k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
7.01k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
4.58k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.73k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
2.03k (x0.61)
TOTAL
18.22k
16.35k (x0.9)

Multithread

J4105

i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
12.93k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
10.21k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
6.22k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
2.37k (x0.49)
TOTAL
61.49k
31.74k (x0.52)

Performance/W
J4105
i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
517 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
409 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
95 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
1269 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
2627 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
762 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
6130 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4