| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core i7-6820HQ


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the i7-6820HQ gets 152.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 2.5 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
506e3
Core
Gemini Lake
Skylake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
10 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
December 2017
October 2015

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
3180 (88.99%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
13020 (146.12%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
4169 (51.68%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
6931 (101.28%)
TOTAL
13165
27299 (107.37%)

Multithread

J4105

i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
13259 (107.45%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
62228 (210.86%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
20342 (99.01%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
5464 (10.58%)
TOTAL
41572
101292 (143.65%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
11536 (135.64%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
16687 (130.00%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
4514 (63.89%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
7273 (119.24%)
TOTAL
18223
40011 (119.57%)

Multithread

J4105

i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
48501 (157.40%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
77016 (180.61%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
21301 (105.74%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
5242 (8.02%)
TOTAL
61495
152060 (147.27%)

Performance/W
J4105
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
1078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
1711 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
473 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
3379 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
3205 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
4635 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1254 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
2020 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
11114 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8