Celeron J4105 vs Core i7-4702MQ
Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 41.6 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 75.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 1.8 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 41.6 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 75.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 1.8 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
306c3
Core
Gemini Lake
Haswell
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /8
TDP
10 W
37 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
December 2017
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
36.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
145.15k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
3.45k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
5.29k
8.53k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
3.99k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.44k
3.51k (x1.02)
TOTAL
13.16k
19.47k (x1.48)
Multithread
J4105
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6.39k
11.93k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
42.4k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.22k
18k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.94k
3.6k (x0.73)
TOTAL
41.57k
75.92k (x1.83)
Performance/W
J4105
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
639 points/W
323 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2002 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1022 points/W
486 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
494 points/W
97 points/W
TOTAL
4157 points/W
2052 points/W
Performance/GHz
J4105
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
673 points/GHz
1078 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2116 points/GHz
2665 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1099 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1377 points/GHz
1096 points/GHz
TOTAL
5266 points/GHz
6085 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4