Celeron J4105 vs Core i5-460 M
Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i5-460 M is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the i5-460 M gets 33.7 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.8 times faster than the i5-460 M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the i5-460 M gets 33.7 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.8 times faster than the i5-460 M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
20655
Core
Gemini Lake
Arrandale
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.533 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
PGA 988A
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
10 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
September 2010
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
16.32k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
33.69k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
i5-460 M
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
6.85k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
4.64k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.72k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
2.1k (x0.63)
TOTAL
18.22k
16.32k (x0.9)
Multithread
J4105
i5-460 M
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
13.71k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
10.68k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
6.65k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
2.65k (x0.55)
TOTAL
61.49k
33.69k (x0.55)
Performance/W
J4105
i5-460 M
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
392 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
305 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
190 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
962 points/W
Performance/GHz
J4105
i5-460 M
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
2447 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
1658 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
751 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4