| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core i5-6400


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i5-6400 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the i5-6400 gets 130.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-6400 is 2.1 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
506e3
Core
Gemini Lake
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
December 2017
September 2015

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
3185 (89.29%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
12581 (137.83%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
4105 (49.35%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
3934 (14.24%)
TOTAL
13165
23805 (80.82%)

Multithread

J4105

i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
10777 (68.62%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
44113 (120.37%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
13887 (35.85%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
7829 (58.45%)
TOTAL
41572
76606 (84.27%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
11411 (133.09%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
16352 (125.38%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
4146 (50.52%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
3277 (-1.23%)
TOTAL
18223
35186 (93.09%)

Multithread

J4105

i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
41474 (120.11%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
65462 (138.52%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
16202 (56.49%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
7660 (57.84%)
TOTAL
61495
130798 (112.70%)

Performance/W
J4105
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
1007 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
2012 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
3458 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
4955 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1256 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
993 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
10662 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8