| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core i5-3337U


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 41.6 k points while the i5-3337U gets 31.7 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3337U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
306a9
Core
Gemini Lake
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
10 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
January 2013

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
2548 (51.45%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
7242 (36.90%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
3257 (18.49%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
3369 (-2.16%)
TOTAL
13165
16417 (24.70%)

Multithread

J4105

i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
5028 (-21.33%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
14786 (-26.14%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
7374 (-27.86%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
4531 (-8.31%)
TOTAL
41572
31719 (-23.70%)

Performance/W
J4105
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
639 points/W
296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2002 points/W
870 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1022 points/W
434 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
494 points/W
267 points/W
TOTAL
4157 points/W
1866 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
673 points/GHz
944 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2116 points/GHz
2682 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1099 points/GHz
1206 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1377 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
5266 points/GHz
6080 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8