| | | | | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core i5-3210M


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the i5-3210M gets 53.7 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
306a9
Core
Gemini Lake
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
10 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
24.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
51.73k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
3.08k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
5.29k
8.58k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
3.76k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.44k
3.99k (x1.16)
TOTAL
13.16k
19.42k (x1.47)

Multithread

J4105

i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
6.39k
5.79k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
18.77k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.22k
8.74k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.94k
4.59k (x0.93)
TOTAL
41.57k
37.89k (x0.91)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
8.59k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
8.88k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
3.59k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
3.45k (x1.04)
TOTAL
18.22k
24.51k (x1.35)

Multithread

J4105

i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
20.18k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
19.96k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
8.93k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
4.6k (x0.95)
TOTAL
61.49k
53.67k (x0.87)

Performance/W
J4105
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
577 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
255 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
131 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
1533 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
2772 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
2864 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1114 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
7908 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4