| | | | | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core i5-2520M


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i5-2520M is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 41.6 k points while the i5-2520M gets 34.2 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-2520M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
206a7
Core
Gemini Lake
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
24.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
50.23k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
2.69k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
5.29k
7.28k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
3.84k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.44k
3.05k (x0.89)
TOTAL
13.16k
16.86k (x1.28)

Multithread

J4105

i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
6.39k
6.08k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
16.15k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.22k
8.87k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.94k
3.06k (x0.62)
TOTAL
41.57k
34.15k (x0.82)

Performance/W
J4105
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
639 points/W
174 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2002 points/W
461 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1022 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
494 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
4157 points/W
976 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
673 points/GHz
840 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2116 points/GHz
2275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1099 points/GHz
1200 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1377 points/GHz
954 points/GHz
TOTAL
5266 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4