| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core i3-6006U


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the i3-6006U gets 47.5 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
406e3
Core
Gemini Lake
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
November 2016

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
2019 (19.98%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
8202 (55.05%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
2631 (-4.28%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
3923 (13.92%)
TOTAL
13165
16774 (27.42%)

Multithread

J4105

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
3826 (-40.14%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
17170 (-14.23%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
5775 (-43.51%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
3619 (-26.76%)
TOTAL
41572
30389 (-26.90%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
7279 (48.69%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
10510 (44.86%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
2808 (1.93%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
2882 (-13.13%)
TOTAL
18223
23479 (28.84%)

Multithread

J4105

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
14976 (-20.52%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
23682 (-13.71%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
6371 (-38.46%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
2435 (-49.83%)
TOTAL
61495
47464 (-22.82%)

Performance/W
J4105
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
998 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
1579 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
425 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
3164 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
3640 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
5255 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
11739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8