| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core i3-4170


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i3-4170 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the i3-4170 gets 66.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-4170 is 1.1 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
306c3
Core
Gemini Lake
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
10 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
March 2015

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
4235 (151.72%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
10580 (99.99%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
4867 (77.08%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
4200 (21.98%)
TOTAL
13165
23882 (81.41%)

Multithread

J4105

i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
7705 (20.55%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
27136 (35.56%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
11480 (12.31%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
2681 (-45.73%)
TOTAL
41572
49003 (17.87%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
13103 (167.64%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
11680 (60.98%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
5065 (83.90%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
4190 (26.30%)
TOTAL
18223
34038 (86.79%)

Multithread

J4105

i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
25810 (36.97%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
25003 (-8.90%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
11964 (15.56%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
3875 (-20.16%)
TOTAL
61495
66651 (8.39%)

Performance/W
J4105
i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
478 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
463 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
222 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
1234 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
3541 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1369 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1132 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
9199 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8