| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core i3-3217U


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i3-3217U is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the i3-3217U gets 32.8 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.9 times faster than the i3-3217U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
306a9
Core
Gemini Lake
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
10 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
Jun 2012

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
i3-3217U
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
1785 (6.10%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
5015 (-5.20%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
2208 (-19.67%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
2310 (-32.91%)
TOTAL
13165
11318 (-14.02%)

Multithread

J4105

i3-3217U
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
3564 (-44.24%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
11466 (-42.72%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
5339 (-47.77%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
2539 (-48.60%)
TOTAL
41572
22908 (-44.90%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
i3-3217U
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
5374 (9.78%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
5254 (-27.58%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
2202 (-20.04%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
2249 (-32.20%)
TOTAL
18223
15081 (-17.24%)

Multithread

J4105

i3-3217U
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
12458 (-33.89%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
12137 (-55.78%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
5519 (-46.70%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
2637 (-45.67%)
TOTAL
61495
32750 (-46.74%)

Performance/W
J4105
i3-3217U
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
733 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
714 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
325 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
155 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
1926 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
i3-3217U
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
2986 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
2919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1224 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1250 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
8378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8