Celeron J4105 vs N5100
Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the N5100 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.5 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.5 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
906c0
Core
Gemini Lake
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2017
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
26.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
89.82k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
9.74k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
9.84k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
3.89k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
3.51k (x1.06)
TOTAL
18.22k
26.98k (x1.48)
Multithread
J4105
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
34.19k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
36.28k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
15.3k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
4.05k (x0.83)
TOTAL
61.49k
89.82k (x1.46)
Performance/W
J4105
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
5699 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
6047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
2550 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
674 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
14970 points/W
Performance/GHz
J4105
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
3479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
3514 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
9637 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4