Celeron J4105 vs N2840
Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the N2840 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 3.7 times faster than the N2840. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 3.7 times faster than the N2840. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
30678
Core
Gemini Lake
Bay Trail-M
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.58 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
1024 kB
Date
December 2017
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
10.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
16.79k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
4.8k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
2.47k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
1.86k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
1.22k (x0.37)
TOTAL
18.22k
10.36k (x0.57)
Multithread
J4105
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
8.24k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
4.19k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
3.05k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
1.32k (x0.27)
TOTAL
61.49k
16.79k (x0.27)
Performance/W
J4105
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
1177 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
598 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
436 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
2399 points/W
Performance/GHz
J4105
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1861 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
958 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
723 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
472 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
4015 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4