| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs G3900TE


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.2 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
506e3
Core
Gemini Lake
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
2048 kB
Date
December 2017
December 2015

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
2365 (40.56%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
9795 (85.16%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
3075 (11.88%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
3359 (-2.44%)
TOTAL
13165
18594 (41.24%)

Multithread

J4105

G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
4451 (-30.37%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
18163 (-9.27%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
5475 (-46.44%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
3504 (-29.08%)
TOTAL
41572
31593 (-24.00%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
8564 (74.94%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
12249 (68.83%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
3174 (15.21%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
3347 (0.90%)
TOTAL
18223
27335 (50.00%)

Multithread

J4105

G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
16422 (-12.84%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
23611 (-13.97%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
5755 (-44.42%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
3548 (-26.88%)
TOTAL
61495
49336 (-19.77%)

Performance/W
J4105
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
469 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
675 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
164 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
1410 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
3724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1455 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
11885 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8