| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs E3300


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E3300 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.5 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
1067a
Core
Gemini Lake
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
1024 kB
Date
December 2017
August 2009

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
2290 (36.12%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
5867 (10.90%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
2487 (-9.50%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
1012 (-70.61%)
TOTAL
13165
11656 (-11.46%)

Multithread

J4105

E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
4574 (-28.43%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
11656 (-41.77%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
4893 (-52.14%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
1037 (-79.01%)
TOTAL
41572
22160 (-46.69%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
2898 (-40.79%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
6377 (-12.11%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
2585 (-6.15%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
1076 (-67.56%)
TOTAL
18223
12937 (-29.01%)

Multithread

J4105

E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
5755 (-69.46%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
12670 (-53.84%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
5158 (-50.18%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
1014 (-79.10%)
TOTAL
61495
24597 (-60.00%)

Performance/W
J4105
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
89 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
195 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
79 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
378 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
431 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5175 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8