| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Celeron D 351


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the 351 is based on NetBurst.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the 351 gets 0 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is INF times faster than the 351. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
f49
Core
Gemini Lake
Prescott-256
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA775
Cores/Threads
4/4
1/1
TDP
10 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
16 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Date
December 2017
Jun 2005

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
351
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
1655 (-1.61%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
2960 (-44.04%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
1431 (-47.92%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
615 (-82.13%)
TOTAL
13165
6662 (-49.39%)

Multithread

J4105

351
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
0 (-100.00%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
0 (-100.00%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
0 (-100.00%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
0 (-100.00%)
TOTAL
41572
0 (-100.00%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
351
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
2223 (-54.59%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
3557 (-50.97%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
1696 (-38.43%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
619 (-81.35%)
TOTAL
18223
8095 (-55.58%)

Multithread

J4105

351
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
0 (-100.00%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
0 (-100.00%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
0 (-100.00%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
0 (-100.00%)
TOTAL
61495
0 (-100.00%)

Performance/W
J4105
351
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
0 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
0 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
0 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
0 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
0 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
351
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
695 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
1112 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
530 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
193 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
2530 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8