| | | | | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Ryzen 5 3500U


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the 3500U gets 149.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3500U is 2.4 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
810f81
Core
Gemini Lake
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
140.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
3.24k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
5.29k
13.16k (x2.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
4.41k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.44k
3.32k (x0.96)
TOTAL
13.16k
24.12k (x1.83)

Multithread

J4105

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.39k
12.95k (x2.03)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
57.84k (x2.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.22k
21.05k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.94k
3.51k (x0.71)
TOTAL
41.57k
95.36k (x2.29)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
11.98k (x2.45)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
15.85k (x2.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
4.53k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
3.29k (x0.99)
TOTAL
18.22k
35.65k (x1.96)

Multithread

J4105

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
48.28k (x2.56)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
74.19k (x2.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
23.29k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
3.47k (x0.71)
TOTAL
61.49k
149.23k (x2.43)

Performance/W
J4105
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
3219 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
4946 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
1553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
231 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
9949 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
3238 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
4283 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1224 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
9634 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4